Theos-Talk Archives (September 2009 Message tt00044)

Cass,

I don't think you are too far off the mark...

But, at the primal beginning of each cycle of manifestation, the  
cosmos is in a state of rest -- which consists of its laya point of  
pure consciousness (of absolute space) spinning in an angular  
momentum of force rays that correspond to the total potential mass- 
energy of each level of the past and future seven fold fractal  
involved manifest fields of cosmic consciousness.

It's this laya point that Einstein called the "singularity" prior to  
the birth of the spacetime continuum... And that the "new science" of  
today sees as being in the center of every black-hole (now called a  
"black-white whole" by Nassim Haramein) as well as in every zero- 
point in total holographic spacetime. (Incidentally, Haramein's  
theory is the closest science has come to verifying the ABC model as  
well as HPB's metaphysics).

THerefore, we might think of this cosmic singularity, or primal  
dimensionless atom of "abstract motion", as the "God particle" that  
is the "seven robed mother" of the Book of Dzyan -- whose still zero- 
point center of pure consciousness is the "father"... And, as HPB  
pointed out, is the primal state of "absolute space" that contains  
the rootless root of both spirit or consciousness, and matter or mass- 
energy.  So, where's the need for an external personal God creator  
when the cosmos is its own creator, sustainer, destroyer or Brahma,  
Vishnu, Shiva (Kether, Binah, Chochma)?

Thus, the inherent consciousness at the primal beginning of our  
present cosmic cycle of manifestation, is the triggering intent of  
will that wakes up and initiates the emanation and radiation of the  
manifest cosmos and all its fractal involved energy fields -- which  
are governed solely by the laws of cycles inherent in original spin  
momentum, after the release of the reactive nature of karma -- like a  
compressed coil spring explosively expanding when the latch holding  
is down is slid open. That's why science calls it the "big  
bang" (and, now, considers each galaxy as starting with an analogous  
little big bang.)

Since the only eternal unchanging reality is that zero-point of pure  
consciousness -- that's why the ever changing manifest cosmos
and all the evolving forms in it, are considered as temporary  
illusions or Maya.

For a closer view of this concept check out my new blog, "How It All  
Began" at:
http://dzyanmaster.wordpress.com/
and compare it with the theories of Haramein at his web site and in  
his video lectures at:
http://www.theresonanceproject.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch? 
v=pPgII_4ciFU&feature=PlayList&p=88EDD1895A2F5587&index=0&playnext=1
or http://tinyurl.com/haramein

Leon

        


On Sep 7, 2009, at 9/7/098:12 PM, Cass Silva wrote:

> Leon,
> This is in response to a poster who struggles with the idea of a  
> godcreated universe.  Am I on the right track?
> Cass
>
> Can I propose that this  primeval particle was a combination of  
> matter and energy? As matter is unable to be destroyed only  
> changed,  could this zero mass reach a point that its constitution  
> in static equilibrium could no longer be contained and that change  
> was the inevitable result of an inherent force acting upon itself?
>
> This then suggests that matter and energy are in a constant state  
> of flux (albeit over billions and billions of years) from static to  
> energetic and that expansion and contraction are  a result or an  
> effect of changing interacting forces.
>
> This then takes god out of the zero point and replaces god with  
> 'force'.  A force that is subject to its own laws?
>
> Cass
>
>
>
>        
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ____________
> Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
> Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]