Theos-Talk Archives (August 2010 Message tt00154)

We can forgive his promiscuity but not his bad golf!
>Cass
>
>From: "Drpsionic@NUeMXFR8FI_LT3FANMsCe864Wu6_pQNY9TLJJaG-y79ySq8h4SyP--3l5luaUghM0BCVOQ4K4kAf.yahoo.invalid" <Drpsionic@NUeMXFR8FI_LT3FANMsCe864Wu6_pQNY9TLJJaG-y79ySq8h4SyP--3l5luaUghM0BCVOQ4K4kAf.yahoo.invalid>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Thu, 12 August, 2010 1:30:55 AM
>Subject: Re: Katinka's Views of Theos-Talk
>
>Â 
>If Tiger Woods had had any brains in his head he would just laughed the 
>whole thing off and said, "I'm a golfer, not a preacher." It would all have 
>been forgotten in a week.
>
>Chuck the Heretic
>
>www.charlescosimano.com 
>
>In a message dated 8/10/2010 2:32:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
>sampsa.kuukasjarvi@kk-K159Rp02elx6wZs_kaWXZGH8M5BXjhKycZZEAkUZ6OUNT1ogIr7Ae9heiqtv7LcKDhK8OckCPJwaOGgWZEZu3jVSRwiM.yahoo.invalid writes:
>
>My answer to Daniel's question is: I think we have gotten some answers from 
>MKR. That is good. Some suspicions against him were misunderstandings.
>
>I wouldn't like to beat our new moderator and hard worker more (he has had 
>hard times lately), but I have to, because he has so loud required 
>transparency from the TS Sections.
>
>What still worries me is that MKR acts like a politician, who is afraid to 
>get caught from a lie. My impression is that he doesn't answer questions 
>properly, but is beating around the bush. For instance: he has not said if 
>he deleted those posts or not. What he says is that the messages are safe 
>elsewhere and that it is possible for posters to delete their messages.
>
>This is a matter of trust and principle. If he has made a mistake, I think 
>he should admit it, and we would be happy. MKR's own advise to Tiger Woods 
>on this list was th_at Tiger should have acknowledges his sins 
>immediately, because the situation got worse due to silence. Isn't there a 
>similar 
>
>situation in here?
>
>Besides, one problem is that at least Preethi and Frank have been censored 
>here while MKR has all the time said that this list is unmoderated. If the 
>reasons for censoring were that the messages were too personal, okay, but 
>let us not talk about an unmoderated list then.
>
>See:
>
>_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
>_http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/53943_ 
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/53943) 
>
>
>(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
>_http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/54478_ 
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/54478) _
>
>Sampsa
>
>--- In _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ 
>(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) _, "Daniel" <danielhcaldwell@...> wrote:
>>
>> The link below gives the most current view Katinka
>> has of Theos-Talk:
>> 
>> _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
>_http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/54524_ 
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/54524) 
>
>_
>> 
>> My question is:
>> 
>> Have all those concerns NOW been answered and addressed and
>> is Katinka reconsidering her view as expressed in the above post?
>> 
>> I bring this up not to put Katinka on the spot but since some of her 
>views were also expressed by other Theos-Talk subscribers, I am thinking 
>outloud:
>> 
>> Have all the concerns and questions as given in her posting been 
>adequately answered and addressed?
>> 
>> Daniel
>>
>
>_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]